When I first sat down to write this article, I thought of a
comment the owner of a film trade shop I used to work at made in 1991. We were
a Scitex shop and the only way to get files from the desktop world to a
printable form was through a Quark Xpress xtension called Visionary. One
afternoon the owner said that someday you would be able to take a 44 meg
Syquest disk to a Fotomat type store and get your print job out the other side.
The general consensus was that he was crazy. The truth is he was a bit off in
his assertion but never-the-less he was thinking outside the box and his
thought was really a vision for POD. So we now fast forward to 2011 and in
September, we will again see a major print show in Chicago that will be
focusing on the continuing evolving technology of digital. Film has been gone
for years and plates are following close behind although will not die as quickly
and painlessly as it’s predecessor. There will be few “BIG” presses on the floor
and everyone will be discussing how their product fits into the “Solution” of
POD/W2P. From workflow solutions to output devices, from finishing equipment to
software as a service (SaaS) platforms, from business cards to building size
large format prints, the focus will be PRINT ON DEMAND.
One interesting reality is that even companies that have been
providing these services for years are facing a crossroad of strategic
decisions as they move forward. The main reason for this is that the cloud is
real and SaaS combined with open source technologies are changing the playing
field. What used to be your choice of chocolate chip or oatmeal, has turned
into a 17-course gourmet dinner served in bed. Anything is possible, affordable
and best yet customizable to your specific needs.
There is still one aspect of the equation that makes the
move to a quality program a challenge and that is commitment. These solutions
work best when they meet the needs of the end user and defining those needs is
often where the development fails. I have had the pleasure of working on
several successful programs and in all cases the lines of communication worked
both ways and EVERYBODY came prepared. There were no miracles or mind reading.
There was no rush to deploy. There was no disappointment. There was a successful deployment and a
program that works for everyone. Everyone is defined as the solution provider,
the client and the end users. Anything less is a failed program.
Today there are still three basic types of POD printing.
- Short run inventory control printing
- Versioned printing
- Full variable data printing
There are also few limits to piece size, type or end use.
Most every piece of print collateral can fit into a POD program.
Switching to a POD program is likely to save upwards of
20-25% of an annual print budget. This savings will continue to grow as
technology continues to evolve and more of the conventional process converts
into the program. Companies often
start with the low hanging fruit for early deployment and quickly realize that
there is so much more that a program can handle. Years two and three of a
program usually result in a program boom. Often companies realize that it is no
longer necessary to have that in-plant facility, that art department, that
three quote process and add to their POD system. This concept was once
described to me like this: why
would you create your own electricity when it is so easy and better to just buy
it from a professional and reliable source. Companies quickly realize that they
were spending an inordinate amount to “control costs” and were overlooking the
hidden costs.
So what are you waiting for? If you are still driving Dad’s
Olsmobile it is time to trade it in on a new and improved model.
Nice information.
ReplyDeleteWell said. Indeed, to remain competitive, or worst yet, to simply survive, printing organizations need to make some hard, strategic decisions. The industry's commoditization and eroding profit margins have caused many firms to move even beyond the POD and/or W2P models. For example, some organizations have gone asset light, outsourced the printing function and invested more heavily into their W2P technology platforms transforming them into robust local marketing automation or marketing resource management platforms. The added value provided by the additional tools and functionality changes the game.
ReplyDeleteVanessa - BINGO. It is sure going to be an interesting few years moving forward. Thanks for the comment.
ReplyDeletevery nice post great information
ReplyDeleteGreat work dude.......
ReplyDeleteThanks for such an excellent write-up!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your Nice Posting!
ReplyDeleteThanks your article is very nice
ReplyDeleteGreat work dude!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your nice posting!
ReplyDeleteNice post.
ReplyDeleteGreat information about print on demand and web to print.
ReplyDelete